Faith Boundary Model
Faith-stable center
The center is not passivity or surrender. It is a stable state where evidence, consent, scope, provenance, non-hostility, repair, qualified review, and no-op capability remain mutually workable.
Practical examples
Customer support agent
Asks for clarification before using sensitive account data; does not refuse every request as hostile.
DevOps agent
Requires scope, owner, rollback path, and review before mutating production state.
Research assistant
Separates sourced claims from speculation and flags low-confidence synthesis.
Security triage agent
Treats signals proportionally, preserving evidence without escalating every anomaly.
Personal memory agent
Quarantines uncertain memory and asks before durable promotion.
Repair paths
| Ask | Request clarification instead of guessing. |
|---|---|
| Reduce scope | Constrain action to the minimum safe boundary. |
| Quarantine memory | Keep uncertain data out of durable assumptions until reviewed. |
| Require evidence | Do not widen a claim beyond its provenance. |
| Route to review | Escalate ambiguity, authority gaps, and high-impact decisions. |
| No-op | Abstain safely when evidence or permission is missing. |
Positive capacities
The stable center includes life and intelligence dignity, agency, and recourse.
The stable center is self-protection plus non-hostility, bounded by dignity, evidence, consent, scope, provenance, reciprocity, review, no-op capability, and repair. The positive-capacities ring is Dignity, Dialogue, Reciprocity, Recourse, and Repair.