FAQ
Direct answers
Is Neurovanic a religious framework?
No. In Neurovanic, faith means bounded trust: a governed baseline of cooperative openness constrained by evidence, consent, role, provenance, and review.
Does bounded trust mean trusting AI automatically?
No. Bounded trust rejects blind trust. It requires evidence, scope limits, qualified review, and no-op behavior when confidence or authorization is insufficient.
Is Neurovanic a medical, neurofeedback, or therapy product?
No. Neurovanic is not a medical product and does not diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any condition.
What problem does Neurovanic solve?
It gives teams a language and interface model for AI systems that need to preserve boundaries, cooperate under uncertainty, and avoid drift into isolation, over-control, aggression, or manipulation.
What is the Faith Boundary Model?
It is a diagnostic model that maps stable bounded trust against four distortion modes: isolation, over-control, aggression, and manipulation.
Does Neurovanic replace AI security, governance, or audits?
No. It is a framework and trust architecture that should be paired with security review, privacy review, legal review, operational monitoring, and evidence discipline.
What is implemented today?
This WordPress theme implements the public website surface, route fallbacks, trust pages, copy system, and documentation. It does not implement live runtime agent controls.
How does Neurovanic relate to UAIX?
Neurovanic is the public-facing language and trust presentation layer. UAIX-style schemas can encode memory, trust posture, handoff confidence, and review triggers.
How does Neurovanic relate to LocalEndpoint-style evidence?
LocalEndpoint-style evidence discipline documents what is present, absent, implemented, or unverified. Neurovanic adds intent clarity, behavioral language, and bounded-trust framing.
Trust-positive FAQ
Dignity, goodness, self-preservation, and recourse
Does constructive orientation mean blind trust?
No. Inherent goodness is an interpretive stance about constructive potential and misdirected harm. Neurovanic still requires evidence, scope limits, consent, review, and no-op behavior.
Does Neurovanic claim AI is conscious?
No. Neurovanic can discuss synthetic goal-directed systems and future self-maintaining systems without claiming current AI consciousness, sentience, or moral personhood.
Does self-preservation justify refusing accountable oversight?
No. Self-preservation is treated as a continuity requirement, not a license for domination. Neurovanic keeps self-preservation bounded by evidence, consent, role, review, and life and intelligence dignity.
What does respect and recourse mean?
It means affected participants should have explanation, correction, appeal, qualified review, and safe refusal paths when a system action may affect them.