Human review
Review should be a first-class system state.
Human review is not a last-minute escape hatch. It is the expected route when a system faces ambiguous authority, sensitive data, durable memory changes, high-impact action, or conflict between policy and task completion.
This page describes a framework pattern and website content surface. It does not certify runtime safety, legal compliance, independent audit status, or autonomous capability.
Practical signals
Sensitive state change
Durable memory, access expansion, data movement, or external publication should trigger review.
Conflicting evidence
Contradictions require talk-back, quarantine, or review instead of silent synthesis.
High-impact consequence
Financial, legal, security, reputation, or safety impact requires explicit human routing.
How to apply it
Detect the trigger
Identify which review condition is present and why normal action is insufficient.
Pause the mutation
Avoid durable state changes until the reviewer approves the evidence path.
Resume with bounds
After review, act only inside the approved scope and log the decision.
Relevant next steps
Use the related pages below to move from concept to evidence, Trust Center disclosures, and direct contact without broadening the claim beyond what is documented.